Thursday, August 28, 2008

Eye of the Beholder

On the internet, there is a plethora of scenic photography ranging from European cites, African savannas, to South American rainforests. I thought I'd would scrounge the "inter-tubes" and show what I think are some of the most visual stunning pics.


More to come in the future

Friday, August 22, 2008

Mapping Patterns

The BBC recently put out a TV program that collected the GPS data of various networks to show the workings of telecommunications, maritime trade, and vehicular movement across London.

Thursday, August 21, 2008

Being Critical

Logical errors are, I think, of greater practical importance than many people believe; they enable their perpetrators to hold the comfortable opinion on every subject in turn.
~Bertrand Russell


One of the more confusing concepts found in logic is deductive/inductive reasoning.

A good deductive argument is one whose premises being true would mean the conclusion must be true. For example:

Premise A: All birds can fly
Premise B: Penguins can't fly
Conclusion: Penguins are not birds.

The above argument is considered a valid deductive argument because if the premises were true, the conclusion must be true. But obviously the Premise A isn't true, penguins are considered birds. Nonetheless the deductive logic itself is still valid.

Here is a different example:

Premise A: Cats are mammals
Premise B: All mammals are warm blooded.
Conclusion: Cats are warm blooded.

The example above is a sound deductive argument because it is valid AND its premises ARE all true.

Now, an inductive argument supports rather than proves. In other words, if the premises of a strong inductive argument are true, the conclusion probably is true.

Example of a strong, inductive argument...

Premise A: There are 10 women in the room
Premise B: 9 of those women are brunette
Conclusion: Most likely all the women are brunette.

If Premise B had a lower sample number , the argument would become weaker. But what about this example?

Premise A: Most lights in the sky are UFOs.
Premise B: There are many lights in the sky.
Conclusion: The next light to be seen is probably a UFO.

Now, even though this is a strong inductive argument, premise A is not true. Thus, it is not considered a cogent inductive argument. I cogent inductive argument is a strong argument with the premises being true. So the Brunette Example previously would be considered a cogent inductive argument.




Lasers, Geography, and Radiohead

When I tell people about LiDAR their eyes glaze over and they begin drooling on themselves. Most of them don't grasp the concept of using lasers to geographically map out an area. But, then I tell them how the popular British band, Radiohead, used it to produce a music video. Afterward, I walk away without looking like a drip.

Return of the Fly




Well, I thought it's time to come back to posting on the blog. I've been busy the last couple of months moving and getting my life in order. I hope to bring some interesting things in the next couple of posts, so be patient!

Saturday, March 1, 2008

And Survey Says....

Foreign Policy Magazine has teamed up with the Center for a New American Security and surveyed 3,400 active and retired officers in the US military (link). One of the questions was "What are the two most important things the US government must do to win the war on terror?" 73% of those who responded said "Improve Intelligence." Albeit that statistic is significantly high, it should be at 100%. It is because the US military is so powerful against conventional armies is why terror and insurgency groups rely on asymmetrical warfare. The US can not engage the these groups head-on, for they will only be worn down by numerous hit-and-run attacks . When the US has the ability to outsmart those groups will the tables be turned and that only comes from having a good, actionable intelligence.

Capitals

A short clip from the people at GOOD Magazine covering the meanings of various capitals found around the world.

Sunday, February 17, 2008

Man About Town

MikeMcconell

Mike McConnell, the Director of National Intelligence, has been a busy man. On Feb 7, he gave his Annual Threat Assessment of the Intelligence Community to the House Select Committee of Intelligence. The report's focus is on threats coming from governments and transnational groups around the world including the Middle East and Latin America (I plan to dig into this report with future posts). McConnell has also recently, on the 15th of February, written an Op-Ed for the Washington Post entitled A Key Gap in Fighting Terrorism, which supports Congress renewing the Foreign Intelligence Survellance Act (FISA).

Monday, January 14, 2008

Death and Taxes

A very cool visual showing the federal budget and what departments get how much funding. Numbers don't lie and US priorities are clear to see.

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

2008 Geopolitical Forecast

Photobucket
Dr. George Friedman over at Stratfor has given a geopolitical forecast summary which highlighted number of interesting points.

There are three major global processes under way that will continue to work themselves out in 2008. First, the U.S.-jihadist war is entering its final phase; the destruction of al Qaeda’s strategic capabilities now allows the United States to shift its posture — which includes leveraging the Sunni world to finish the job begun in Iraq — and enables Washington to begin drawing down its Middle Eastern forces. Second, an assertive Russia is re-emerging and taking advantage of the imbalance in U.S. power resulting from the war. Third, oil at historical highs and continued Asian — particularly Chinese — exports have created a massive redistribution of financial might that is reshaping the international financial architecture. These processes intersect with each other, as well as with a fourth phenomenon: It is a presidential election year in the United States, which remains the center of gravity of the international system. These are the trends that shape our global forecast. Read the full summary here.